On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 00:34:32 GMT, Claes Redestad <redes...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> These tables are used for both URL and non-URL based on the parameter, and 
>> they are only two of the three lut tables used (the other is in 
>> `base64_AVX2_decode_tables_addr` ).  Both names are essentially incorrect.  
>> Does the name really matter that much?  It's the same as 
>> `base64_AVX2_decode_tables_addr` with the addition of URL tables.
>
> Names are important, but always hard to get right. At the very least they 
> need to be correct. Maybe call it something like 
> `..parameterized_decode_tables..` and the other `..shared_decode_tables..`?

I prefer leaving them the way they are.  I don't think the names, along with 
the associated comments within the tables, causes any undue confusion as to 
their function.  However I will implement the name change if that's all it 
takes to procure a review approval.  Please provide the specific names you'd 
like me to use and I'll change them.  Or just approve as-is :-).

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12126

Reply via email to