On Mon, 30 Jan 2023 20:10:17 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti <rgiulie...@openjdk.org> 
wrote:

>> I see; it might suffice in this case to rely on the bug information in the 
>> SCM history, but I don't have a strong opinion.
>
> In this specific `*.java.template` case, I think that the bug id in the 
> comment somehow replaces the lack of the @bug line.
> But I have no problems in removing it if there are stronger opinions.

The `@bug` tag is in `BasicTestLauncher` which is where 8300869 should likely 
go.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12259

Reply via email to