> On Jan 26, 2023, at 9:27 PM, Glavo <zjx001...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> They only need to use "str".toLowerCase(Locale.ROOT).

Sorry, with a workaround I meant to have toLowerCase() work without modifying 
the existing source code to use toLowerCase(Locale.ROOT).

Xuelei

> 
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 1:18 PM Xuelei Fan <xuele...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:xuele...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Just curious, this is a known issue for many years, how those areas like 
>> Turkish survive?  Is there a workaround for those areas or the use of the 
>> methods is not common any longer?
>> 
>> Xuelei 
>> 
>>> On Jan 26, 2023, at 4:35 AM, Glavo <zjx001...@gmail.com 
>>> <mailto:zjx001...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> At present, the no-parameter toLowerCase and toUpperCase methods of String 
>>> are based on the default locale.
>>> 
>>> I checked all the uses of this method in OpenJDK, and found that most of 
>>> the use cases are suspicious, and even there are some hidden bugs.
>>> For example, I just found that jdk.incubator.vector.LaneType will trigger 
>>> assertion failure on Turkish locale, and opened a PR for this problem:
>>> 
>>> https://github.com/openjdk/panama-vector/pull/210
>>> 
>>> In addition to such obvious problems, some use cases behave suspiciously 
>>> after calling Locale.setDefault.
>>> I am investigating these problems and preparing to open a PR to solve these 
>>> hidden bugs.
>>> 
>>> In all the third-party libraries I have used, I have never seen the correct 
>>> use of these two methods.
>>> Although the behavior of modifying API methods is destructive, I think it 
>>> is worthwhile to consider whether to modify its behavior for such a 
>>> suspicious method.
>>> If users need locale-sensitive case conversion, it may be better to 
>>> explicitly use Locale.getDefault().
>>> Using Locale.ROOT as the default value also helps to keep the behavior of 
>>> these two methods consistent with equalsIgnoreCase, 
>>> Character.toLowerCase/toUpperCase and other methods.
>>> 
>>> This is my rough idea. I hope to get your suggestions.
>> 

Reply via email to