Hi Alexey, great! I've created the PR: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/11922
Best regards, David Schumann Am Mo., 9. Jan. 2023 um 23:57 Uhr schrieb Alexey Semenyuk < alexey.semen...@oracle.com>: > Hi David, > > The request to adjust osx linker command lines looks reasonable. Please > go ahead with a pull request. > > - Alexey > > On 1/9/2023 1:21 AM, David Holmes wrote: > > On 8/01/2023 8:39 pm, David Schumann wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> I'm not 100% sure if this list is the correct one for this topic, > >> feel free to redirect me. > > > > core-libs-dev - cc'd > > > > Cheers, > > David > > > >> Currently the jpackageapplauncher binary gets linked without the > >> "-headerpad_max_install_names" argument on osx. This prevents a user > >> from using the install_name_tool with the launcher binary. > >> This means that it's currently not possible to include dylibs in the > >> application bundle. > >> > >> To provide a bit more context: > >> I'm using jpackage to build an app bundle. The java application > >> itself uses external native libraries, which internally use dlopen to > >> reference other libs. Normaly one would include the other libs in the > >> app bundle, and use the install_name_tool to tell the dynamic linker > >> which paths to load the libraries from. However since the launcher > >> binary doesn't get linked with the correct arguments, this isn't > >> possible. > >> > >> I wanted to discuss this change, and it it makes sense for me to open > >> a pull request for it. > >> The change would be in > >> > https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/make/modules/jdk.jpackage/Lib.gmk#L76 > >> < > https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/make/modules/jdk.jpackage/Lib.gmk#L76> > > >> > >> > >> Best Regards, > >> David Schumann > >> > >
