On Wed, 14 Dec 2022 09:51:20 GMT, Alan Bateman <al...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> src/java.base/unix/native/libjli/java_md.c line 177: >> >>> 175: char clientPattern[] = "lib/client"; >>> 176: char serverPattern[] = "lib/server"; >>> 177: char minimalPattern[] = "lib/minimal"; >> >> I don't see any point in adding this when the MinimalVM is not really >> relevant to current JDK. > > Yeah, the minimal VM build probably needs wider discussion. There are bug > reports when it breaks so some people are still building it. The context here > seems to be that LD_LIBRARY_PATH set to a location that includes > "lib/minimal" so somewhat unusual setup. It seems like it's a separate issue > for discussion. >From launcher perspective, lib/minimal is just another "suspicious" keyword in >LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Launcher is not affected by any other problems related to >minimal VM. I think that launcher should support all VM variants consistently, as long as we can build a minimal VM from the current JDK sources. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11645
