On Thu, 27 Oct 2022 11:24:32 GMT, Daniel Fuchs <dfu...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> How about `_unused` or `_unused1`, `_unused2` then in the meantime?
>
> I'd be happy to make the change. Let's wait to see if anybody has a better 
> naming suggestion.

Hello Daniel, I think calling it `unused` is fine. I did a quick search in the 
JDK code and we already have places where we use such a variable name for 
similar usecase. I don't see the need for using an underscore as a prefix, but 
it is OK with me if you and others prefer to use it.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10874

Reply via email to