> I've added a `java.lang.invoke.MethodHandle.TRACE_CALLSITE` property to show
> how invokedynamic call sites are resolved.
>
> For example:
>
>
> public class StrConcat {
> static String hello = "Hello";
> static String world = "World";
> public static void main(String args[]) {
> System.out.println(hello + world);
> System.out.println(hello + "World");
> }
> }
>
> $ java -Djava.lang.invoke.MethodHandle.TRACE_CALLSITE=true -cp . StrConcat
> ======== CallSite: StrConcat.main(StrConcat.java:5)
> BSM =
> java.base/java.lang.invoke.StringConcatFactory.makeConcatWithConstants(StringConcatFactory.java:354)
> target class = java.lang.invoke.BoundMethodHandle$Species_L
> target = (String,String)String : BMH.reinvoke=Lambda(a0:L/SpeciesData[L =>
> Species_L],a1:L,a2:L)=>{
> t3:L=Species_L.argL0(a0:L);
> t4:L=MethodHandle.invokeBasic(t3:L,a1:L,a2:L);t4:L}
> & BMH=[
> 0: MethodHandle = {(Object,Object)String :
> DMH.invokeStatic=Lambda(a0:L,a1:L,a2:L)=>{
> t3:L=DirectMethodHandle.internalMemberName(a0:L);
> t4:L=MethodHandle.linkToStatic(a1:L,a2:L,t3:L);t4:L}
> &
> DMH.MN=java.lang.StringConcatHelper.simpleConcat(Object,Object)String/invokeStatic
> }
> ]
> HelloWorld
> ======== CallSite: StrConcat.main(StrConcat.java:6)
> BSM =
> java.base/java.lang.invoke.StringConcatFactory.makeConcatWithConstants(StringConcatFactory.java:354)
> target class = java.lang.invoke.BoundMethodHandle$Species_LL
> target = (String)String : invoke=Lambda(a0:L/SpeciesData[LL =>
> BoundMethodHandle$Species_LL],a1:L)=>{
> t2:L=BoundMethodHandle$Species_LL.argL1(a0:L);
> t3:L=BoundMethodHandle$Species_LL.argL0(a0:L);
> t4:L=MethodHandle.invokeBasic(t3:L,a1:L,t2:L);t4:L}
> & BMH=[
> 0: MethodHandle = {(Object,Object)String :
> DMH.invokeStatic=Lambda(a0:L,a1:L,a2:L)=>{
> t3:L=DirectMethodHandle.internalMemberName(a0:L);
> t4:L=MethodHandle.linkToStatic(a1:L,a2:L,t3:L);t4:L}
> &
> DMH.MN=java.lang.StringConcatHelper.simpleConcat(Object,Object)String/invokeStatic
> }
> 1: ( World )
> ]
> HelloWorld
>
>
> More complex examples are in the JBS bug report
> - https://bugs.openjdk.org/secure/attachment/101170/eclipse-ide-log.txt
> - https://bugs.openjdk.org/secure/attachment/101168/lambda-expression.txt
> -
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/secure/attachment/101174/pattern-matching-switch.txt
> - https://bugs.openjdk.org/secure/attachment/101169/str-concat.txt
Ioi Lam has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a
rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the
merge/rebase. The pull request contains six additional commits since the last
revision:
- Merge branch 'master' into 8295537-trace-jli-dynamic-call-sites
- Use Thread::getStackTrace() to find the caller's line number, etc
- @JornVernee comments
- also print the BSM
- cleaned up code; added comments; avoid using indy inside TRACE_CALLSITE;
avoid interleaving output
- 8295537: Debug tracing for resolved dynamic call sites
-------------
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10842/files
- new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10842/files/c26cbd7c..5d2ac5a2
Webrevs:
- full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=10842&range=03
- incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=10842&range=02-03
Stats: 154080 lines in 1740 files changed: 87176 ins; 33940 del; 32964 mod
Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10842.diff
Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10842/head:pull/10842
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10842
