On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 01:38:52 GMT, David Holmes <dhol...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> I left that in there since it would possibly be a useful utility to have for 
>> other JLI code that might need to work with Windows errors in the future
>
> In that case shouldn't the `JLI_xxx` naming scheme be retained?

$0.02, leave it for local use until its needed elsewhere, it is easier to 
maintain if the scope of use is unambiguous.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9749

Reply via email to