On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 01:38:52 GMT, David Holmes <dhol...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> I left that in there since it would possibly be a useful utility to have for >> other JLI code that might need to work with Windows errors in the future > > In that case shouldn't the `JLI_xxx` naming scheme be retained? $0.02, leave it for local use until its needed elsewhere, it is easier to maintain if the scope of use is unambiguous. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9749