On Tue, 4 Oct 2022 11:41:31 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>>> I agree that getting rid of the clone can help -- but since [JEP >>> 416](https://openjdk.org/jeps/416) the generators modified here is mostly a >>> fallback and the bulk of the use will use `MethodHandles` (unless you >>> disable JEP 416 and fall back to the legacy impl). I was mostly curious if >>> you had a startup or other benchmark running on mainline where the change >>> you're doing here could be observed. >> >> @stsypanov like @cl4es said, I expect these dynamically generated methods >> should only be generated during very early VM startup. Once the module >> system is initialized, it will use method handles. >> >> How do you run the spring-based applications when you observe these methods >> being called? While this change is trivial and no harm to include this >> change, this code is planned to be removed in a future release. > > @mlchung I can put here a stack trace of the application invoking the code if > you are interested @stsypanov would be helpful to understand when this code still gets executed. Also note that JEP 416 was integrated in JDK 18 so some details about the runtime would be necessary to get a complete picture. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10526
