On Tue, 20 Sep 2022 10:49:59 GMT, Lance Andersen <lan...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>>> OK, will make another pass at this today
>> 
>> I looked at the latest draft (2bafc00c). I think it would help if the 
>> section "Verifying a JarInputStream" were renamed to "Signed JAR files".  
>> The link to getManifest makes the reader wonder if they have to call this 
>> method whereas I think what you want to say that the manifest must be at the 
>> start of the stream (as per the first section) and then followed by 
>> signature entries.
>
>> > OK, will make another pass at this today
>> 
>> I looked at the latest draft 
>> ([2bafc00](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/2bafc00cc462b7af3f724371ac1bef5fd99c989c)).
>>  I think it would help if the section "Verifying a JarInputStream" were 
>> renamed to "Signed JAR files".
> 
> OK, I will change as you suggest
> 
>  The link to getManifest makes the reader wonder if they have to call this 
> method whereas I think what you want to say that the manifest must be at the 
> start of the stream (as per the first section) and then followed by signature 
> entries.
> 
> The reason I used the getManifest wording is I felt it was easier and less 
> redundant than copying the wording about the Manifest needing to be either 
> the first or second entry (assuming META-INF/ is the first in the stream).  
> However if you prefer that, I will make that change.

Thanks for the updates in 69138715.  Just one comment on the updated text, and 
specifically this sentence:

+ *  A {@code JarInputStream} may be used to verify the signatures of a
+ *  <a href="{@docRoot}/../specs/jar/jar.html#signed-jar-file">signed JAR 
file</a>
+ *  assuming the following requirements are met:

The signatures are verified by default so I think you can reduce this down to:
 
A {@code JarInputStream}  verifies the signatures of entries in a <a 
href="{@docRoot}/../specs/jar/jar.html#signed-jar-file">Signed JAR file</a>  
when:

We could say that a program could opt-out of verification by using the 2-arg 
constructor but that is probably too much to try to fit in here.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10045

Reply via email to