On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 17:14:20 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> Currently some operations of RandomAccessFile are implemented with multiple > read() invocations: > > public final int readInt() throws IOException { > int ch1 = this.read(); > int ch2 = this.read(); > int ch3 = this.read(); > int ch4 = this.read(); > if ((ch1 | ch2 | ch3 | ch4) < 0) > throw new EOFException(); > return ((ch1 << 24) + (ch2 << 16) + (ch3 << 8) + (ch4 << 0)); > } > > This can be improved by using bulk reads: > > public final int readInt() throws IOException { > readFully(readBuffer, 0, 4); > return Bits.getInt(readBuffer, 0); > } > > Benchmarking: > > baselile > Benchmark (kiloBytes) Mode Cnt Score > Error Units > RandomAccessFileReadBenchmark.readInt 1 avgt 10 1060,526 ± > 62,036 us/op > RandomAccessFileReadBenchmark.readInt 5 avgt 10 5745,671 ± > 1374,277 us/op > RandomAccessFileReadBenchmark.readLong 1 avgt 10 1399,494 ± > 378,072 us/op > RandomAccessFileReadBenchmark.readLong 5 avgt 10 4864,425 ± > 329,282 us/op > RandomAccessFileReadBenchmark.readShort 1 avgt 10 1111,163 ± > 70,883 us/op > RandomAccessFileReadBenchmark.readShort 5 avgt 10 4933,058 ± > 339,273 us/op > > patch > Benchmark (kiloBytes) Mode Cnt Score > Error Units > RandomAccessFileReadBenchmark.readInt 1 avgt 10 311,404 ± > 17,337 us/op > RandomAccessFileReadBenchmark.readInt 5 avgt 10 1210,381 ± > 22,742 us/op > RandomAccessFileReadBenchmark.readLong 1 avgt 10 201,726 ± > 8,885 us/op > RandomAccessFileReadBenchmark.readLong 5 avgt 10 667,117 ± > 6,779 us/op > RandomAccessFileReadBenchmark.readShort 1 avgt 10 560,259 ± > 16,783 us/op > RandomAccessFileReadBenchmark.readShort 5 avgt 10 2251,975 ± > 54,533 us/op src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/RandomAccessFile.java line 78: > 76: private volatile boolean closed; > 77: > 78: private final byte[] readBuffer = new byte[8]; As `readBuffer` is used in multiple places without synchronization, doesn't this create a race condition? ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10031