On Mon, 18 Jul 2022 07:40:53 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev <sh...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> Test appears to pass fine with G1. But it fails with other GCs, for example 
> Parallel, Shenandoah, etc, it fails:
> 
> 
> $ CONF=linux-x86_64-server-fastdebug make test 
> TEST=java/io/ObjectStreamClass/ObjectStreamClassCaching.java 
> TEST_VM_OPTS="-XX:+UseParallelGC"
> 
> test ObjectStreamClassCaching.testCacheReleaseUnderMemoryPressure(): success
> test ObjectStreamClassCaching.testCachingEffectiveness(): failure
> java.lang.AssertionError: Cache lost entry although memory was not under 
> pressure expected [false] but found [true]
>       at org.testng.Assert.fail(Assert.java:99)
>       at org.testng.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:1037)
>       at org.testng.Assert.assertFalse(Assert.java:67)
> 
> 
> I believe this is because `System.gc()` is not that reliable about what 
> happens with weak references. As seen with other GCs, they can clear the 
> weakrefs on Full GC. In fact, the test fails with G1 if we do a second 
> System.gc() in this test. So the test itself is flaky. The fix is to avoid 
> doing `System.gc()` altogether in that subtest. The test is still retained to 
> see that reference is not cleared for a while.
> 
> Additional testing:
>  - [x] Linux x86_64 fastdebug, affected test with `-XX:+UseSerialGC`, 100 
> repetitions
>  - [x] Linux x86_64 fastdebug, affected test with `-XX:+UseParallelGC`, 100 
> repetitions
>  - [x] Linux x86_64 fastdebug, affected test with `-XX:+UseG1GC`, 100 
> repetitions
>  - [x] Linux x86_64 fastdebug, affected test with `-XX:+UseShenandoahGC`, 100 
> repetitions
>  - [x] Linux x86_64 fastdebug, affected test with `-XX:+UseZGC`, 100 
> repetitions

What I was trying to say above is that without System.gc() the test would 
succeed even if caching was not actually there and lookup always constructed 
new ObjectStreamClass instance. There's not enough allocation activity to clear 
the WeakReference constructed in the test with the ObjectStreamClass referent 
even if that referent was only weakly reachable...

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9533

Reply via email to