On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 11:42 PM, David Fotland <[email protected]> wrote:
> Or it might be an artifact of the way I do > search, since I think I might be the only engine that doesn't use a single > shared tree, and the old Many Faces of Go engine is single threaded. If not a single shared tree, what are you doing? Root parallelism? I've been wondering why other programs are pulling ahead of Orego, and now I'm starting to suspect the answer may be (in part) "hardware". -- Peter Drake https://sites.google.com/a/lclark.edu/drake/ _______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
