Wait patiently. Someone will eventually test your theory, and you will find out whether you are right or wrong.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Leon Matoh Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 10:01 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Computer-go] Go is not much different from chess Hi, It started with endgame. It is a hack and i like it. When I normalized winrates that means I assign a value to best move. When bot maximazes winrate it actually plays the best move it can see in the tree. When bot tries to kill and plays agressive it tries to maximaze the result. When plays strange moves when winning it is because it cannot differentiate between winrates close to 1 When I say normalized winrate with random komi I actually mean << alfa-beta prunning with statistic >>. Of course this "hack" will play a little worse now because it was not designed for this even if all things have their counterparts in alfa-beta prunning. Please see for yourself. Or somebody else if there is someone willing. And normalization takes a little more time. Now if you suspence your disbelief and look at it from different perspective. I know you think I am a little driven, but there is nobody else to be on my side yet. My goal is to play the perfect game. And this is a step to that direction in my opinion. Leon _______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go _______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
