>> On frisbee Go itself I used the following definition: >> 1. An intended play must be legal -- no playing on top of a stone hoping >> it 'falls' to the neighbor positions. > > Accepted.
What's the point of this rule? I feel it is an unnecessary restriction, similar to the no-suicide rule, and would vote against it. As I said before, it suffices to have positive probability of a legal move. In real life frisbee go, a player doesn't need to state his intended throwing target, so if it ends up landing in a legal place, it's accepted, regardless of whether it was aimed there, or at a possibly occupied neighbour. regards, -John _______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
