> > > How do you know that an implicit expression (of length smaller than 10^80) > of the number does not exist? :) >
I am pretty sure that such an implicit expression exists: it is << the number of etc etc.... >> (formalized for your favorite set of rules :-) ). -- ========================================================= Olivier Teytaud, INRIA TAO Research Fellow --- http://www.slideshare.net/teytaud "Please stop quoting me on internet."___ Albert Einstein
_______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
