So, I now have a new version of my bot running on CGOS ( http://cgos.boardspace.net/13x13/cross/Imrscl-016-AMAF.html). It's still considerably weaker than GnuGo so I'm pretty sure it will loose all games against it. However, it's now much stronger than any other bot running on CGOS and I guess it will be hard to get a good rating. Are there any bots that I could run that are weaker than GnuGo, but not that much weaker?
Urban On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Urban Hafner <cont...@urbanhafner.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 4:29 PM, folkert <folk...@vanheusden.com> wrote: > >> I have a small cluster of raspberry pi-s (7) that normally run a >> distributed chess engine. Since they're mostly idle, I can a couple of >> Go engines on them if you like. They're the 512MB rpi1 models. There's >> +/- 256MB of ram available on them. >> > > If you want I can hand over the details for Brown. It's just a random > player, but it's a good benchmark to check for serious bugs, i.e. if you > loose to Brown you have a really bad bug in your program and you need to > check your code. I can of course continue to run it, but it won't be online > 24/7. > > I also assume that a raspberry pi could be enough to run GnuGo 3.8 (I use > the following options: --mode gtp --level 10 --chinese-rules > --positional-superko --capture-all-dead --score aftermath > --play-out-aftermath) > > Urban > -- > Blog: http://bettong.net/ > Twitter: https://twitter.com/ujh > Homepage: http://www.urbanhafner.com/ > -- Blog: http://bettong.net/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/ujh Homepage: http://www.urbanhafner.com/
_______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
