Hi all, I am working on a successor to Valkyria written in C++.
I agree with Petr here. I am still tweaking the basic engine and I have still lot to fix. With a sloppy implementation initially I have 20 kpps for 9x9 and 4.5 kpps for 19x19. When the basic stuff is running I will build feature detection directly into the engine first based on my experiences from Valkyria. It will not be fast when
board features are calculated but a lot of features necessary for heavy playouts will come for almost free. Magnus Persson On 2015-01-14 13:32, Petr Baudis wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 01:26:44PM +0100, Urban Hafner wrote:
If I did it again, after picking some really low-hanging optimization fruit I'd rther focus on implementing playout heuristics, only then coming back to optimize the board code when it is clear what all information I need to compute the heuristics efficiently (list of up to N libs, maybe pre-computed pattern hashes, etc.).
_______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
