2014-12-15 21:31 GMT+00:00 Petr Baudis <pa...@ucw.cz>: > > Still, strong play makes sense for a strong predictor. I believe I > can also beat GNUGo >90% of time in blitz settings without doing pretty > much *any* concious sequence reading. So I would expect a module that's > supposed to mirror my intuition to do the same. >
I'm very surprised you are so confident in beating GnuGo over 90% of time in *blitz settings*. There are even people complaining he couldn't beat GnuGo http://www.lifein19x19.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=170 > > Finally, I am not a fan of NN in the MCTS architecture. The NN > architecture imposes a high CPU burden (e.g., compared to decision trees), > and this study didn't produce such a breakthrough in accuracy that I would > give away performance. > > ...so maybe it is MCTS that has to go! We could be in for more > surprises. Don't be emotionally attached to your groups. > Fair enough. :) Aja
_______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
