Your point is obvious but that's a horrible proof since there are usually more
than one legal moves from which to chose (that means it takes more time).
steve uurtamo wrote:
As for other things we'd like to see improved, we could build a list. My pet
peeve is the KGS "score estimator", which is often wildly wrong.
an SE can't be any smarter than a computer player that runs in the
amount of time that you're willing to wait for the SE to calculate*.
so don't expect much. ever. recall that the SE runs locally in your
client.
s.
* proof: if it were, then it would make a better computer player by
just evaluating its score estimate at all legal board points and
choosing the maximum at each move.
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
