Hi Jason, Thanks for your numbers. I might try to limit my bot to 50k playouts and 1 core, but I usually simulate as long as time permits. Do you suspect my pure UCT version has bugs, too, judging from its rating? I find it hard to find good tests for the correctness of a program depending on "randomness", and even harder to find bugs. Maybe we can set up our bots to play under similar circumstances on CGOS.
Regards, Isaac > My bot is about 1/4-1/2 of the speed of yours, but here are my strength > numbers (median of reported bayeselo numbers below): > HouseBot Rango_004 > RAVE - 1778 ELO 1721 ELO > UCT - 1587 ELO 1642 ELO > > Given the tremendous speed difference between our bots, I suspect you may > have some debugging to do :( I'll try to put my bot up on CGOS again in > the > next few days. Maybe some head to head games will best answer how our > implementations compare to each other. -- Jetzt 1 Monat kostenlos! GMX FreeDSL - Telefonanschluss + DSL für nur 17,95 Euro/mtl.!* http://dsl.gmx.de/?ac=OM.AD.PD003K11308T4569a _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
