On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Isaac Deutsch <i...@gmx.ch> wrote:
> By the way, I got about 75 ELO points (1650->1720) with light playouts out
> of RAVE. Do you think this is in the expected range? It's not really similar
> to the 20%->60% win rate rise vs. GnuGo described in some papers...
My bot is about 1/4-1/2 of the speed of yours, but here are my strength
numbers (median of reported bayeselo numbers below):
HouseBot Rango_004
RAVE - 1778 ELO 1721 ELO
UCT - 1587 ELO 1642 ELO
Given the tremendous speed difference between our bots, I suspect you may
have some debugging to do :( I'll try to put my bot up on CGOS again in the
next few days. Maybe some head to head games will best answer how our
implementations compare to each other.
HouseBot parameters:
One search thread
Max 50k playouts per move (time control may reduce)
No pondering
Variants with RAVE in the name: UCT+RAVE
Variants with UCT in the name: UCT without RAVE
hb-797-RAVE-50k 1826
hb-791-RAVE-50k 1778
hb-819-RAVE-50k 1715
hb-799-UCT-50k 1606
hb-797-UCT-50k 1605
hb-770-UCT-50k 1570
hb-791-UCT-50k 1556
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
