> > I think it was the surprisingly useful combination of UCT with Monte-Carlo > that got the attention of the 'old school' Go programmers.
I would say "Monte-Carlo + Tree Search" rather than "Monte-Carlo + UCT". You can have a very strong program without UCT. You can't without the incremental tree + the Monte-Carlo search. Best regards, Olivier
_______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
