If you look at my original email, I did not mention removing that until after I showed and discussed the numbers. And even then, I said "... it is probably
safe to remove...". Probably being the operative word indicating that I had not yet tested that.
Mark Boon wrote:
Hehe, this reminds me of the title of a CNN program: 'Keeping them
honest' ;-)
OK, let me add that check back in to see if I get better results.
Mark
On 28-okt-08, at 13:18, Michael Williams wrote:
My original chart of numbers was created before it occurred to me that
maybe the check whether the move has been played before is not
needed. It is of course possible that the check IS needed. I ran a
new test after removing that check and the numbers don't look as good:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
