Has the program become that much stronger on 9x9 recently?
(Compared to the version was trying?)

*Parallelization: MPI ==> ~80% vs no mpi in 9x9 (for same number of
 cores).

*Monte-Carlo improvement ==> strongly depends on number of simulations
   and number of cores (as the multi-core reduces the influence of the
   computational overhead), ~55% I guess.

*Openings: 58%, for games with constant time per move (should be higher
   for games with given total time), if we only keep the openings which
   are still efficient in the new version of the code. Human-based
   openings do not work :-(

*less interestingly, we have a better hardware than at that time (more
   cores, more GHz).

==> no doubt that this mogo is by far stronger than the one at Amsterdam 07.

The improvement is much higher in 19x19, but humans are really too strong in 19x19 :-)
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

Reply via email to