> > I am concerned that the current study is, as Jacques has so ably described, a > study of a restricted game where nakade and certain other moves are > considered to be illegal; this restricted game approaches the game of Go, but > the programs have certain blind spots which humans can and do take advantage > of. These aren't computer-specific blind spots; humans train on > life-and-death problems in order to gain an advantage over other humans also. > This is good news and nothing to worry about. You are basically saying mogo has a bug, and if this bug is fixed then we can expect even better scalability. So any success here can be viewed as a lower bound on it's actual rating.
If a nakade fixed version of mogo (that is truly scalable) was in the study, how much higher would it be in your estimation? - Don _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
