I just finished a few 19x19 games with the freely downloadable version of Mogo, 
and noticed that Mogo loses a fair number of points in the endgame.

I'll email an sgf file shortly, but the pattern is fairly easy to describe: 
when territories have been fairly well enclosed, Mogo will just as often play
inside its own territory as fill a "dame" or neutral point which is claimed by 
neither player. It will even ignore common yose plays at the edges.

I seldom play Chinese rules, so my understanding may be deficient; please 
correct me if so. 

My observations seem to match this description: 
http://senseis.xmp.net/?TerritoryAndAreaScoring

Under Japanese rules, it doesn't matter who plays dame; they don't count as 
territory. Under Chinese rules, it is important to play dame, which 
effectively expands one's area. I understand area to mean the count of one's 
territory plus one's live stones.

I won a couple games against Mogo by the simple expedient of patiently filling 
in dame, connecting any singletons left in atari, and capturing any singletons 
- all of which increase my stones on the board without diminishing my territory 
- that is, increasing my area. As I steadily increased my score, Mogo would 
play inside its own territory, which neither increases nor decreases area. I'd 
pass, Mogo would pass, and the score would show me ahead by a few points. This 
was on a dual-core athlon with 1800 seconds total time and two threads. 

Reviewing the TerritoryAndAreaScoring page, it occurs to me that there are 
several conventions regarding the handling of handicap stones with Chinese 
scoring; I was using GoGui to compute the area score, and will look into the 
conventions. It is possible that Mogo uses a different convention than GoGui, 
and may have estimated the score a bit differently. More study. 

If yose handling were improved, Mogo ( and perhaps other similar programs ) 
would be a few stones stronger. This looks like "low-hanging fruit," but I 
could be wrong.

Terry McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
They mean to govern well; but they mean to govern. They promise to be kind 
masters; but they mean to be masters. -- Daniel Webster




      
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ 
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

Reply via email to