Le mardi 4 décembre 2007, Christoph Birk a écrit : > On Tue, 4 Dec 2007, Alain Baeckeroot wrote: > >> For 9x9 ELO works better. For 19x19 it's less clear cut. The > >> handicap system appears to be a good system at 19x19 and has the very > >> nice merit of allowing grossly mismatched players to compete. I > >> think the two systems can be married by adding a fixed offset per stone > >> handicap to your ELO. > >> > > > > Stats from official european go federation, on 150 000 games nearly solves > > the problem of doing ELO vs handicap matching. > > http://gemma.ujf.cas.cz/~cieply/GO/statev.html > > > > Just need to find one anchor, lets says gnugo , rated 6k on kgs in > > 2007-11... > > That's nice, but on 19x19. I was interested in calibrating > CGOS 9x9 versus some moderatly strong humans.
It is possible to download mogo games on kgs and filter dan players games then make some stats. My estimate was more than 2d (kgs) for mogo 1.0 some monthes ago. My experience on 9x9 on kgs against mogo_1.0: I was 1 kyu on kgs and mogo was significantly stronger than me: i lose more than 2/3 on 10 games, and the rare victories were due to some blunder of mogo (nakade in corner, instead of seki). Alain _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
