On 11/15/07, Chris Fant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 15, 2007 3:20 PM, Eric Boesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/14/07, Chris Fant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Based on more recent emails, this may not be useful anymore, but I > > > have a list of 361 32-bit numbers that satisfy these properties in > > > case anyone is interested. > > > > I'd be interested in your implementation tricks. Where did the number > > 17 come from? > > 17 didn't come from me. Here's how I made my list: > > Start with 500 random numbers. > Throw out the ones that violate the tests. > Hope that you are left with enough (361). > > This actually worked all the way down to 15-bit numbers.
Neat. Was the 15-bit version for 81 values or 361? At the risk of putting my foot in my mouth, I don't think there exist 361 15-bit numbers that satisfy minimum requirements (if the floating-point average of any four code values is a code value, then the four code values are identical). _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
