On 9/17/07, Don Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Another way to test this, to see if this is your problem, is for ME to > implement YOUR eye definition and see if/how much it hurts AnchorMan. > > I'm pretty much swamped with work today - but I may give this a try at > some point. >
I'd be interested in seeing that. It looks like my first hack at an alternate eye implementation bought my AMAF version about 150 ELO (not tested with anything else). Of course, what I did isn't what others are using. I'll do another "alteye" version either today or tomorrow. It may be possible that some of my 150 was because I changed the lengths of the random playouts.
_______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
