I don't think so. They are different concepts as well as functions. Learning is, changing internal state according to external input and then changing future behavior of a system. Creativity here is, to generate a new method by combining methods the system already has, in order to solve a problem.
Hideki Weimin Xiao: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >I would believe the creativity is implied in learning. > >Weimin > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Hideki Kato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "computer-go" <[email protected]> >Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2007 7:38 AM >Subject: Re: [computer-go] Intelligence > > >Hi Erik, > >Erik van der Werf: ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>IMO the adaptation is just a means to an end. The end (Intelligence, >>whatever it is) does not necessarily require adaptation. > >I used to think learning is required for intelligence but recently >I'd like to propose some creativity is. > >Hideki (gg) >-- >[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kato) >_______________________________________________ >computer-go mailing list >[email protected] >http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ > >_______________________________________________ >computer-go mailing list >[email protected] >http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kato) _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
