Hello Sylvain and Don, I prefer 32-bit OS as Core series is not better for 64 bit and try not nocona but pentium-m. For overclocking, usually 3 GHz (333 MHz FSB x 9 for E6700) is very easy without core volt doping.
-gg (Hideki) Don Dailey: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 18:50 +0100, Sylvain Gelly wrote: >> > I'm very much interested in core 2 duo performance and would >> appreciate >> > hearing what others have experienced in this regard. I don't know >> what >> > OS you use, but here are my experiences so far with Linux: >> >> You seem to have exactly the same processor as I have access to. And I >> get much better performance than you. Maybe it comes from the system: >> - which compiler do you use? >> - which libc do you use? >> - what is your "-march" option and -O ? >> >> I use g++ 4.1.1, -march=opteron, -O3, and quite recent linux >> installation (Mandriva 2007). >> For me also, everything is in 32bits and I did not optimize further >> for this processor. >> >> Maybe changing these things would explain the difference between the >> performance I get and you get. (should be > 2. for you). >> >> Sylvain > >I'm using gcc 4.1.2 on a new Edgy Eft Ubuntu distribution. > >My options are -O3 -march=nocona with other minor options that see to >help a tiny bit. > >I'll try the opteron option to see what happens. I never tried that >but I've tried other architectures and most of what I read claims the >best to use is -march=nocona for the core 2 duo. > >- Don > > > >_______________________________________________ >computer-go mailing list >computer-go@computer-go.org >http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kato) _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
