That is what I initially thought, but when I reread "renormalize it repeatedly", I figured you must not mean that because that would just give you a single pixel after N iterations.
On 2/20/07, David Doshay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for doing this so quickly! But it was not what I was trying to ask for. The renormalization I was suggesting would make each successive lattice smaller by a factor of 3 in each direction at each step. Cheers, David On 20, Feb 2007, at 8:29 PM, Chris Fant wrote: >> Is there any chance you would take the whole lattice and >> renormalize it >> repeatedly this way? > > I have used a 5-block shape like a cross. > > http://fantius.com/0.bmp (the initial image) > http://fantius.com/1.bmp > http://fantius.com/2.bmp > http://fantius.com/3.bmp > http://fantius.com/4.bmp > http://fantius.com/5.bmp > http://fantius.com/6.bmp > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > computer-go@computer-go.org > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
_______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
