That is correct. Down to "small" is enough.
But if done all the way to just one pixel it will show the winner. Cheers, David On 20, Feb 2007, at 8:53 PM, Chris Fant wrote:
That is what I initially thought, but when I reread "renormalize it repeatedly", I figured you must not mean that because that would just give you a single pixel after N iterations.
_______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
