>> 2. Give white N stones at end of game. (N = handicap)
I vote for 2. But my reason is that 2 is the closest to some future international Go rules. I.e it allows for smooth integration of area and territory scoring. Łukasz On 12/28/06, Urban Hafner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Dec 28, 2006, at 10:28 , Rémi Coulom wrote: > Don Dailey wrote: >> I'll take a final poll - speak now or forever hold your peace! >> >> Should we: >> >> 1. Give white N-1 stones at end of game. (where N = handicap) >> 2. Give white N stones at end of game. (N = handicap) >> 3. Give white N stones except handicap 1 case. >> 4. Not worry about giving white anything but the appropriate >> handicap stones. >> >> Option 4 seems a lot cleaner and is WYSIWYG at end of game along >> with komi of course. >> >> > I vote for 2 because that is what KGS does, and that is how I have > implemented handicap in my program. I'd vote for 2, too. Because that's the way (apparently) KGS does it so it seems like a good idea not to have two different ways to handle things out there.
Urban - -- http://bettong.net - Urban's Blog -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin) iD8DBQFFk54TggNuVCIrEyURAl8gAKCmAaCyui9h2OiiwfXjAtQxOwos3ACeK9VD Ps93rXG75Mqo5XPuu1e2ocI= =Me// -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
_______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
