On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 00:04 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > So that I can follow this discussion, how would be the "kgs level" of > > > this player (it is the only level I have access to when looking at the > > > results of game)? > > > > Wouldn't it be 1 dan on KGS? > I don't know because some seem to say that the KGS level is not the "true" > level? If so, MoGo has already won against players with a "d" on KGS, you can > look at the archive looking for regular expression "\[.d" at: > http://www.gokgs.com/gameArchives.jsp?user=mogobot&y=2006&m=11 > > Of course, I don't know if it was "real" games in the sense that players were > playing at their best level. But perhaps some of these games, and it was 13 > minutes games. MoGo also won a game against a "[8d?]" on kgs (the game is > marked as "unfinished", but I think it is, isn't it?). > http://files.gokgs.com/games/2006/11/20/MoGoBot-chunga.sgf > > Again, it is perhaps "not real games", but perhaps, I can judge that, sorry. > > Of course, it is still a low winning rate... > > Again, I can't judge the games, so I apologize if what I say is irrelevant :).
I don't know either. I assumed William Shubert tries to keep them in line with actual ratings but I can't say if they are off. Of course you realize that people will say ratings are "off" even if they are close. The human mind finds patterns where there are none. Of course they may really be off. I just don't know. We could start with GnuGo's rating at 19x19 pretend it's accurate for 9x9, but I'm sure most programs are better relative to humans at smaller boards. I cannot find gnugo on kgs - there is no way that I can find to do partial searches on user names and I don't know the exact name of any gnugo bots. > Sylvain > _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
