suresh, thanks for jumping in from webhdfs side.
apparently, the issues that were affecting us with jetty 6 have been address with newer jetty versions. my take would be we move forward with the version change and we make sure webhdfs is not affected, do you have a test that exercises webhdfs under load? that would definitely help thx Alejandro (phone typing) On Jul 8, 2013, at 17:43, Suresh Srinivas <sur...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > Isn't Jetty used by WebHDFS? Given that, Jetty performance is still > important. > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur <t...@cloudera.com>wrote: > >> [moving bigtop to bcc] >> >> Tim, >> >> Except from HADOOP-9680 which has significant code changes and some false >> changes (which I did not go thru), all other changes seem OK. >> >> * Have you had a change to run ALL Hadoop testcases with them applied to >> make sure there are not regression? >> >> * Have you look at the output of running 'mvn dependency:tree' without/with >> the patches to verify unwanted dependencies are not sneaking in? >> >> On HADOOP-9650 (not included in the above list): >> >> Moving from Jetty6 to Jetty9 should be OK if there are not regressions. I >> was chatting with ToddL about the issues we had before in and according to >> Jetty guys they've been fixed in newer Jetty versions. Also, we are not >> using Jetty for shuffle anymore (we use Netty), so Jetty is not 'stress' >> that much anymore as it is used for the web UIs and for NN-SNN >> checkpointing. >> >> From the patch some code changes are required, once that is take care we >> should repeat the bullet item above for this patch. >> >> In addition, we have to see how this will play with other projects like >> HBase that are using HttpServer from hadoop-common. I'll forward this part >> of the email to their dev@ so they can watch/jump-in if necessary in the >> JIRA. >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Tim St Clair <tstcl...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> Arun, >>> >>> I realize you're probably pretty busy (or on vacation), but I figured I >>> would re-ping this thread to inquire about the status of the patch set >>> listed below.?.? >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9594 >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9610 >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9611 >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9613 >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9680 / 9623 >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Tim >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: "Arun C Murthy" <a...@hortonworks.com> >>>> To: yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org >>>> Cc: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org, mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org, >>> hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org, d...@bigtop.apache.org >>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 12:54:11 PM >>>> Subject: Re: Bringing Hadoop to Fedora >>>> >>>> Tim, >>>> >>>> This is great! I'll take a look at some of these patches, welcome! >>>> >>>> Arun >>>> >>>> On Jun 11, 2013, at 8:54 AM, Tim St Clair wrote: >>>> >>>>> Greetings Hadoop Development Community, >>>>> >>>>> As some of you are aware, we've been looking to bring the upstream >> 2.X >>>>> series into the Fedora channels. We believe that there are several >>>>> benefits that this can bring to the community: >>>>> >>>>> - Updated & streamlined rpm packaging >>>>> - Deeper level of system integration >>>>> - System managed dependencies (security + defect tracking) >>>>> - Proving ground for OpenJDK7 >>>>> - Greater exposure for the community (both adoption and defect >>> tracking) >>>>> ... >>>>> >>>>> During our evaluation ( >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Hadoop >>> ), >>>>> we've come across some build issues as they relate to Fedora >> packaging >>>>> guidelines (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java). Most of >>> these >>>>> issues (listed below) are very minor dependency changes, and we were >>>>> wondering if there are folks who would be willing to review. >>>>> >>>>> fedora-patch-math: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9594 >>>>> fedora-patch-collections: >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9610 >>>>> fedora-patch-cglib: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9611 >>>>> fedora-patch-jersey: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9613 >>>>> fedora-patch-jets3t: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9623 >>>>> (uber deprecated) >>>>> >>>>> There are other patches we have in the queue but they still need to >> be >>>>> flushed out, and in an effort to follow the KISS principles we figure >>> this >>>>> would be a good start. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Tim >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Arun C. Murthy >>>> Hortonworks Inc. >>>> http://hortonworks.com/ >> >> >> >> -- >> Alejandro > > > > -- > http://hortonworks.com/download/
