Isn't Jetty used by WebHDFS? Given that, Jetty performance is still important.
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur <t...@cloudera.com>wrote: > [moving bigtop to bcc] > > Tim, > > Except from HADOOP-9680 which has significant code changes and some false > changes (which I did not go thru), all other changes seem OK. > > * Have you had a change to run ALL Hadoop testcases with them applied to > make sure there are not regression? > > * Have you look at the output of running 'mvn dependency:tree' without/with > the patches to verify unwanted dependencies are not sneaking in? > > On HADOOP-9650 (not included in the above list): > > Moving from Jetty6 to Jetty9 should be OK if there are not regressions. I > was chatting with ToddL about the issues we had before in and according to > Jetty guys they've been fixed in newer Jetty versions. Also, we are not > using Jetty for shuffle anymore (we use Netty), so Jetty is not 'stress' > that much anymore as it is used for the web UIs and for NN-SNN > checkpointing. > > From the patch some code changes are required, once that is take care we > should repeat the bullet item above for this patch. > > In addition, we have to see how this will play with other projects like > HBase that are using HttpServer from hadoop-common. I'll forward this part > of the email to their dev@ so they can watch/jump-in if necessary in the > JIRA. > > Thanks. > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Tim St Clair <tstcl...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > Arun, > > > > I realize you're probably pretty busy (or on vacation), but I figured I > > would re-ping this thread to inquire about the status of the patch set > > listed below.?.? > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9594 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9610 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9611 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9613 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9680 / 9623 > > > > Cheers, > > Tim > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Arun C Murthy" <a...@hortonworks.com> > > > To: yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org > > > Cc: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org, mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org, > > hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org, d...@bigtop.apache.org > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 12:54:11 PM > > > Subject: Re: Bringing Hadoop to Fedora > > > > > > Tim, > > > > > > This is great! I'll take a look at some of these patches, welcome! > > > > > > Arun > > > > > > On Jun 11, 2013, at 8:54 AM, Tim St Clair wrote: > > > > > > > Greetings Hadoop Development Community, > > > > > > > > As some of you are aware, we've been looking to bring the upstream > 2.X > > > > series into the Fedora channels. We believe that there are several > > > > benefits that this can bring to the community: > > > > > > > > - Updated & streamlined rpm packaging > > > > - Deeper level of system integration > > > > - System managed dependencies (security + defect tracking) > > > > - Proving ground for OpenJDK7 > > > > - Greater exposure for the community (both adoption and defect > > tracking) > > > > ... > > > > > > > > During our evaluation ( > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Hadoop > > ), > > > > we've come across some build issues as they relate to Fedora > packaging > > > > guidelines (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java). Most of > > these > > > > issues (listed below) are very minor dependency changes, and we were > > > > wondering if there are folks who would be willing to review. > > > > > > > > fedora-patch-math: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9594 > > > > fedora-patch-collections: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9610 > > > > fedora-patch-cglib: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9611 > > > > fedora-patch-jersey: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9613 > > > > fedora-patch-jets3t: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9623 > > > > (uber deprecated) > > > > > > > > There are other patches we have in the queue but they still need to > be > > > > flushed out, and in an effort to follow the KISS principles we figure > > this > > > > would be a good start. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Tim > > > > > > -- > > > Arun C. Murthy > > > Hortonworks Inc. > > > http://hortonworks.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Alejandro > -- http://hortonworks.com/download/
