lhotari commented on PR #24346: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/24346#issuecomment-2909689816
> @lhotari Thanks for expanding my horizons. I would be very happy if there is anything I can do. > > > @berg223 There's also #22560 in this area by @dao-jun . Any feedback on #22560 or https://github.com/lhotari/pulsar/pull/207 is appreciated. I just finished rebasing https://github.com/lhotari/pulsar/pull/207 which is something that I have been working on since October 2024. I'd like to get those changes into a better state. It would be useful to have a benchmark for Pulsar where the main goal would be to minimize the number of reads to bookkeeper so that it would be possible to show how broker cache improvements or other improvements on Pulsar side such as this change or #22560 would be beneficial. There aren't any workload simulation tests in Pulsar currently. They wouldn't necessarily need to be something that does a massive load test since the efficiency could be shown also in relatively small scale. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
