xiaoxiang781216 commented on PR #6606: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/6606#issuecomment-1183925230
> @xiaoxiang781216 I agree to fix the inconsistency that is currently present in the code, but IMO `CONFIG_HAVE_LONG_LONG` does not mean "use long long". I mean that it would be good to have an option to disable long long support if code needs to be tuned for small size even if compiler supports it. This is definitely not a scope of this PR, but do you consider this reasonable? Yes, it's better to unify CONFIG_LIBC_LONG_LONG and CONFIG_HAVE_LONG_LONG into one option and selectable from Kconfig. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
