acassis commented on PR #17352:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/17352#issuecomment-3570083216

   > > > When signals are disabled, the related POSIX APIs—including sleep, 
usleep, kill, pkill, and pthread—will be disabled as well.
   > > 
   > > 
   > > It's too limit that sleep/usleep can't be called when 
CONFIG_DISABLE_SIGNALS equals true, so I would suggest that this feature should 
be done by level:
   > > 
   > > 1. disable all signal related functionality like this pr
   > > 2. disable signal function related to signal handler(callback), but  
keep other simple but frequnctly used function(e.g. wait/sigwait/ppoll).
   > > 3. enable all signal functionality like before
   > 
   > Upon reconsideration, I prefer to only allow disabling all signal-related 
functionality, and re-implement the signal-dependent functions such as 
sleep()/usleep() using the newly added scheduler-based sleep APIs.
   > 
   >     1. This approach is clearer and safer. If we allow disabling only part 
of the signal subsystem, we would need to modify the implementations of the 
remaining signal functions. At the same time, we cannot guarantee that those 
functions will continue to behave exactly as before. Even worse, it becomes 
harder for users to understand the actual impact of partially disabling signal 
features.
   > 
   >     2. With PR [sched/sleep: add support for scheduling sleep 
#17200](https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/17200)  introducing 
scheduler-based sleep support, and PR [sched/sleep: replace all Signal-based 
sleep implement to Scheduled sleep 
#17204](https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/17204)  replacing all signal-based 
sleep implementations in drivers and the filesystem with scheduler-based 
versions, the overall dependency on signals has already been significantly 
reduced.
   > 
   >     3. We can re-implement the libc sleep()/usleep() functions using the 
new API added by PR [sched/sleep: Add nxsched_nanosleep() API 
#17368](https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/17368). This will even be more 
lightweight compared to the current signal-based wait mechanism.
   
   Yes, these points your raised makes total sense.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to