kywwilson11 commented on code in PR #17007:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/17007#discussion_r2353345425


##########
arch/arm/src/stm32h5/stm32_adc.h:
##########
@@ -498,8 +521,8 @@ extern "C"
 
 struct adc_dev_s;
 struct adc_dev_s *stm32h5_adc_initialize(int intf,
-                                         const uint8_t *chanlist,
-                                         int nchannels);
+                                         struct stm32_adc_channel_s *chanlist
+                                         , int nchannels);

Review Comment:
   I did not completely ignore your comment. I made major changes to my commit 
to conform with NuttX standards. I also removed the p_gpio and n_gpio as you 
suggested from this structure. 
   
   But no, I am not going to update the rest of the stm32 chips to use this 
interface. I am not paid by apache NuttX. I am adding support for a product my 
company is developing. I don't understand the hostility. Without me, and the 
work of a former co-worker of mine, there would be 0 support for the STM32H5.  
@acassis maybe you want to comment. Is this really how moderators are supposed 
to interact with developers?
   



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to