pussuw commented on code in PR #16194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16194#discussion_r2058921148
##########
sched/semaphore/sem_recover.c:
##########
@@ -86,7 +86,8 @@ void nxsem_recover(FAR struct tcb_s *tcb)
if (tcb->task_state == TSTATE_WAIT_SEM)
{
FAR sem_t *sem = tcb->waitobj;
- DEBUGASSERT(sem != NULL && atomic_read(NXSEM_COUNT(sem)) < 0);
+
+ DEBUGASSERT(sem != NULL);
/* Restore the correct priority of all threads that hold references
Review Comment:
In case of mutex, only 1 can hold a reference, the holder itself. Should the
call to nxsem_canceled be omitted when dealing with mutexes ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
