nuttxpr commented on PR #16024: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16024#issuecomment-2737758343
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) Yes, this PR generally meets the NuttX requirements, but could be improved. Here's a breakdown: **Strengths:** * **Clear Summary:** The summary explains the "why," "what," and "how" of the change, linking it back to the original issue and mailing list discussion. * **Impact Assessment:** Addresses most impact areas, explicitly stating the lack of impact on existing drivers and the plan for documentation. * **Testing Strategy Outlined:** Explains the current testing limitations due to the nature of the change (new API with no implementing drivers yet) and outlines next steps. **Areas for Improvement:** * **More Specific "How":** While the summary mentions a common API, it only lists a few technologies (LoRa, FSK, OOK). Providing a few specific examples of new IOCTL commands and their parameters would strengthen the description of "how" the change works. Example: "Adds `IOCTL_RF_SET_FREQUENCY` which takes a `uint32_t` frequency in Hz." * **Complete Testing Section:** The testing section needs to be filled out more thoroughly. While acknowledging the limitations is good, the "Testing logs before change" and "Testing logs after change" sections are empty. Even if the new API isn't used yet, show *some* logs demonstrating the existing SX126x driver still works after the changes. This proves the changes haven't inadvertently broken anything. Include specific commands used and expected outputs. * **Build Host/Target Details:** The "Testing" section is missing crucial details about the build host and target environments. Be specific: "Build Host: Linux (Ubuntu 20.04), x86_64, GCC 9.4.0. Target: sim:qemu-arm." This is essential for reproducibility. * **Documentation Impact Clarification:** While it mentions documentation updates will follow, be more explicit. Will a new document be created, or will existing documentation be updated? If the latter, specify which files. * **Consider Security/Compatibility in More Detail:** While marked "NO," briefly justify why there are no security or compatibility implications. For example: "Security Impact: NO - This change only introduces new API calls and does not alter any existing functionality, therefore no new security vulnerabilities are introduced. Compatibility Impact: NO - This change is additive and does not modify existing driver behavior. New drivers are encouraged but not required to use the new API." This demonstrates you've considered these aspects. By addressing these points, the PR will be even stronger and more readily accepted. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
