nuttxpr commented on PR #15959: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15959#issuecomment-2709259241
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) No, this PR does not fully meet the NuttX requirements. While it provides a summary of the change, it lacks crucial details. Here's a breakdown of what's missing: * **Insufficient Summary:** While the summary describes *what* is being changed, it fails to adequately explain *why*. What problem does merging these structures solve? What are the benefits (e.g., reduced memory usage, simplified API, improved performance)? How does it "enhance consistency"? * **Missing Impact Assessment:** "N/A" is not acceptable. Even seemingly small changes can have unexpected impacts. The author needs to carefully consider and document the impact on each area (user, build, hardware, documentation, security, compatibility). For example, does this change affect any existing drivers or applications that use the old structure? Does it change the size of the watchdog structure, potentially impacting memory usage on resource-constrained devices? * **Inadequate Testing:** "ostest" is too vague. What specific tests within ostest were run? What were the *expected* results? The provided log sections are empty, making it impossible to verify the change's effectiveness. The author should include relevant log snippets demonstrating the watchdog functionality before and after the change, highlighting the improvement or fix. Additionally, the build host and target details are missing. In short, the PR needs more detail and evidence to demonstrate that the change is beneficial, safe, and well-tested. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
