nuttxpr commented on PR #15931:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15931#issuecomment-2694202924

   [**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback 
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
   
   
   
   No, this PR does not fully meet the NuttX requirements based on the 
information provided.  Here's why:
   
   * **Insufficient Summary:**  The summary is too brief. It mentions *what* is 
changing but not *why*.  What problem does this solve? Is it a performance 
improvement, bug fix, or new feature?  How does writing directly to the 
`reqbuf` work?  No related issues are referenced.
   * **Incomplete Impact Assessment:** The impact section only mentions 
"cdcacm."  This is insufficient. All other impact categories need to be 
addressed with either "NO" or "YES (with an explanation)." The lack of detail 
makes it impossible to assess the risks and benefits of this change.
   * **Inadequate Testing:**  "selftest" is not enough.  Provide specific 
details about the selftest performed, including:
       * Build Host information (OS, CPU, Compiler)
       * Target information (Architecture, Board, Configuration)
       * **Crucially:**  Actual "before" and "after" logs demonstrating the 
change in behavior.  Empty code blocks are unacceptable.  Show the output 
demonstrating the problem before the change and the improved/corrected behavior 
after the change.
   
   **To make this PR acceptable, it needs the following:**
   
   1. **Expanded Summary:** Explain the rationale behind the change. What 
problem does it solve or what improvement does it provide?  Provide more detail 
on the mechanism of writing directly to `reqbuf`. Link to relevant NuttX or 
NuttX Apps issues.
   2. **Complete Impact Assessment:**  Address *all* impact categories. Explain 
any "YES" answers thoroughly.
   3. **Detailed Testing Information:**  Fill in the blanks for build host and 
target details. Provide *actual* log output before and after the change, 
demonstrating the issue being fixed or the new functionality working as 
expected.  If "selftest" is a specific NuttX test, name it explicitly.
   
   
   By addressing these points, the PR will be much more likely to be accepted.  
The more information provided, the easier it is for reviewers to understand and 
approve the changes.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to