nuttxpr commented on PR #15729: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15729#issuecomment-2625872274
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) No, this PR does not fully meet the NuttX requirements. While it provides a summary of the change, it lacks crucial details. Here's why: * **Insufficient Summary:** While the title describes *what* changed, it doesn't explain *why*. What problem did renaming `raw_spin_lock` to `spin_lock_prempt` solve? What was the motivation? How does this change work? * **Incomplete Impact Assessment:** Simply stating "spin_lock" doesn't provide enough information. The impact section needs to explicitly address *all* the points listed in the requirements: impact on the user, build, hardware, documentation, security, and compatibility. Even if the answer is "NO" for most of these, it needs to be stated explicitly. * **Inadequate Testing:** "ci" is not sufficient. The testing section requires details about the build host and target environments where the changes were tested. It also requires *actual* testing logs from before and after the change to demonstrate the effect of the modification. Just saying "ci" doesn't prove that the change was properly tested. To meet the requirements, the PR needs to be significantly expanded to provide all the necessary information. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
