nuttxpr commented on PR #15695: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15695#issuecomment-2614193925
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) No, this PR does not fully meet the NuttX requirements as presented. The Impact and Testing sections are incomplete placeholders. While the Summary section identifies *what* changed, it lacks crucial context: * **WHY**: Why is this change necessary? What problem does it solve? Is `spin_lock_irqrestore` buggy? Is this a performance optimization? The justification is missing. * **HOW**: A more detailed explanation of *how* the change works is needed. What are the implications of switching to `raw_spin_lock_irqrestore`? What are the differences between the two functions? Does this change affect interrupt handling? **To make this PR compliant, the following needs to be addressed:** * **Summary:** Expand on the *why* and *how* of the change. Link a relevant NuttX issue if this addresses a reported bug or implements a requested feature. * **Impact:** Fill out all relevant sections. Consider impacts on interrupt latency, real-time performance, and potential race conditions. Even if the answer is "NO" for most, explicitly stating so is helpful. * **Testing:** Provide specific details about the testing environment (Host OS, compiler version, target architecture, board, configuration). Include actual logs demonstrating the behavior before and after the change. Simply stating that it "works as intended" is insufficient. Show evidence. What tests were run? Were there any performance benchmarks? Example of an improved Summary: > The current implementation using `spin_lock_irqrestore` can lead to excessive interrupt latency in certain scenarios [link to NuttX issue if applicable]. This change replaces it with `raw_spin_lock_irqrestore`, which directly manipulates the interrupt state without additional overhead. This is expected to reduce interrupt latency and improve real-time performance. The difference between the two functions is that `spin_lock_irqrestore` [explain the difference, e.g., handles nesting, etc.], whereas `raw_spin_lock_irqrestore` [explain its behavior]. By providing this missing information, the PR will be much easier to review and merge. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
