chaokunyang opened a new issue, #3558:
URL: https://github.com/apache/fory/issues/3558

   ### Feature Request
   
   _No response_
   
   ### Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe
   
   This is fory benchmarkk result in https://github.com/apache/fory/pull/3551
   <img width="4200" height="900" alt="Image" 
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/25c22fb3-45bc-48dc-9629-955644ed0fe3";
 />
   
   Fory struct is not fast for struct. 
   
   Fory binary protocol is more efficient than protobuf, fory don't need to 
write tag-based kv data, but in the benchmark result here, fory is not fast 
enough. There must be more performance gains to squeze
   
   ### Describe the solution you'd like
   
   Take Java generated Serializer code for struct as reference, update fory 
dart codegen to generate mpre efficient serializer code
   
   ### Describe alternatives you've considered
   
   _No response_
   
   ### Additional context
   
   _No response_


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to