[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17520738#comment-17520738
 ] 

Ekaterina Dimitrova commented on CASSANDRA-14752:
-------------------------------------------------

So Jenkins failed with some weird rpm errors. I realized I didn't use the image 
used for CI but one built more recently so there might be some differences 
causing troubles. Pushed with the right image, nightlies connection issues but 
those errors I saw before are gone. I wanted to be sure about them as CircleCI 
does not test our packaging, only Jenkins.

I pushed CircleCI runs for all three branches, still running: 

 [3.11 
CircleCI|https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/ekaterinadimitrova2/cassandra/1525/workflows/86e5bb0d-2e14-472e-a9f3-312b24ac1a38]

4.0 
[j8|https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/ekaterinadimitrova2/cassandra/1526/workflows/9855f9f5-4543-4fa6-a2a9-11ec0718f1e4],
 
[j11|https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/ekaterinadimitrova2/cassandra/1526/workflows/e4dbf043-aaf3-471a-bae6-931676df893c]

trunk 
[j8|https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/ekaterinadimitrova2/cassandra/1527/workflows/81685d1c-5349-4f44-b39b-d655ccb00cee],
 
[j11|https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/ekaterinadimitrova2/cassandra/1527/workflows/efbb02f0-f6fd-4d8f-92d1-404f1699d7b0]

> serializers/BooleanSerializer.java is using static bytebuffers which may 
> cause problem for subsequent operations
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-14752
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14752
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Legacy/Core
>            Reporter: Varun Barala
>            Assignee: Ekaterina Dimitrova
>            Priority: Normal
>             Fix For: 3.11.x, 4.0.x, 4.x
>
>         Attachments: patch, patch-modified
>
>
> [https://github.com/apache/cassandra/blob/trunk/src/java/org/apache/cassandra/serializers/BooleanSerializer.java#L26]
>  It has two static Bytebuffer variables:-
> {code:java}
> private static final ByteBuffer TRUE = ByteBuffer.wrap(new byte[]{1});
> private static final ByteBuffer FALSE = ByteBuffer.wrap(new byte[]{0});{code}
> What will happen if the position of these Bytebuffers is being changed by 
> some other operations? It'll affect other subsequent operations. -IMO Using 
> static is not a good idea here.-
> A potential place where it can become problematic: 
> [https://github.com/apache/cassandra/blob/cassandra-2.1.13/src/java/org/apache/cassandra/db/marshal/AbstractCompositeType.java#L243]
>  Since we are calling *`.remaining()`* It may give wrong results _i.e 0_ if 
> these Bytebuffers have been used previously.
> Solution: 
>  
> [https://github.com/apache/cassandra/blob/trunk/src/java/org/apache/cassandra/serializers/BooleanSerializer.java#L42]
>  Every time we return new bytebuffer object. Please do let me know If there 
> is a better way. I'd like to contribute. Thanks!!
> {code:java}
> public ByteBuffer serialize(Boolean value)
> {
> return (value == null) ? ByteBufferUtil.EMPTY_BYTE_BUFFER
> : value ? ByteBuffer.wrap(new byte[] {1}) : ByteBuffer.wrap(new byte[] {0}); 
> // false
> }
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org

Reply via email to